Site icon All About Cardiovascular System and Disorders

 The “VT Algorithm” Mega-Guide: Brugada, Vereckei, and Pava Criteria

YouTube video player

Distinguishing Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) from Supraventricular Tachycardia with aberrancy (SVT-A) is a critical skill in cardiology. When faced with a Regular Wide Complex Tachycardia (WCT), the three important diagnostic algorithms are Brugada, Vereckei, and Pava.


1. The Brugada Algorithm

The Brugada criteria is a four-step sequential “decision tree.” If any step is positive, you stop and diagnose VT. If none are met, the diagnosis is SVT.

StepQuestionIf YES…If NO…
1Absence of an RS complex in all precordial leads (V1–V6)?VTMove to Step 2
2Is the RS interval > 100 ms in any precordial lead?VTMove to Step 3
3Is there AV Dissociation (P waves independent of QRS)?VTMove to Step 4
4Are morphology criteria for VT present in V1-V2 and V6?VTSVT

2. The Vereckei Algorithm (aVR Lead)

Vereckei simplified the process by focusing primarily on Lead aVR. Because aVR is essentially “looking down” from the right shoulder into the heart, VT (which often travels “up” from the apex) looks very different from SVT.

  1. Initial R wave: Is there an initial R wave in aVR? If yes -> VT.
  2. Initial r or q width: Is the width of the initial r or q wave > 40 ms? If yes -> VT.
  3. Notching: Is there notching on the initial downstroke of a predominantly negative QRS? If yes -> VT.
  4. Ventricular Activation Velocity Ratio (Vi/Vt): Compare the voltage change in the first 40 ms (Vi) to the last 40 ms (Vt). If Vi/Vt ≤ 1 (slow initial entry) -> VT.

3. The Pava Criterion (Lead II)

Pava et al. introduced an “ultra-simple” method focusing on Lead II. It is based on the principle that VT originates in the muscle (slow conduction) while SVT uses the specialized conduction system (fast initial conduction).

Exit mobile version